At least Lawlz made an attempt to rank them:

Top tier:
WM
WG
Apex
Ahol
{Rp}

Mid tier:
Warlighters
LEA
M'Hunters
French Community
[NL]
{101st}
Sninja
Vitrix Mortalis

Low tier:
MSF
Royal Falcons
After Dark
Lost Wolves
{Olympus}<-- After dark 2
{CORP}
Poon Squad

Trouble is if this is by skill he messed a few things up. GG, Lynx, [20], Master all overlooked...perhaps he was just listing some in each tier. If so, {rp} is not a top tier clan (skill wise). Many in the mid tier are not on that skill level of Warlighters and French on there.

Anyway, too bad another worthwhile discussion was derailed by Thomas.

Give a reason why MSF is the low tier?

vitrix mortalis is experienced

vitrix mortalis is experienced

Well, because they are not at all competitive. I'm just going based on skill. There are clans like LEA that are run well IMO, but would still be lower tier skill wise.

At any rate, the original question was who is liked/not. Has nothing to do with skill there. A poll is probably better for that. Something that you rate each clan whether you like/dislike them.

Edited 3/30/2015 20:51:33

fair enough. MSF is a peoples' clan, not a barbarian dick waving clan.

Strangely, 1v1 skill does not equate to social status sometimes.

{rp} is not a top tier clan (skill wise).

Something which is never considered is also how much a clan entertain their members, which is the main objective of a clan, skill is not everything, some clans are way better into making great scenarios/game templates or map making ( {rp} has good map makers such as Dameon who made the most famous game of thrones map, after_dark has zxct who made the current best rated map, etc), and this is as valuable as a clan being "skill wise".

Rating clans is not really possible or many factors should be considered.

Edited 3/30/2015 21:06:13

Thing is, Chris, I'm ranking based off PR not skill. Who is the most respected, decently respected, and least since that is what OP was asking for.

Well, you can rate clans in two ways. By skill (good/bad), or by approval (like/dislike). Just because a clan does not get high marks for skill does not make them a bad clan. Their purpose may not be competitive at all. But if they are neither skilled nor liked, then that is another story.

Take a person in life. You better either be skilled (athletic, smart, whatever measure of skill) or well liked (funny, empathetic, well connected, etc). Otherwise, I don't think you will get very far. A clan with neither skill nor reputation does not have much going for it.

XD Bane

No Lynx Lalwz.

Is a clan judged by basing it off individuals or as a whole?

Social status wouldn't be just about skill

simple test
ask a bunch of low level members in each of these clans how happy they are with the clan, that would be the truest measure

That's the problem Thomas there should'nt be "low level" members in a clan everyone is of equal stature in a clan no matter what.

thats called communism and doesn't work

We are currently led by Poseidó̱nas and his second-in-command Hera (EW)!

ours says roughly the same thing about me colonel and cade.


you can't have an equal society!!

Led being the key word I do not consider myself above anyone in my clan and consider everyone to be equal.
Everyone will soon have a role regardless of how long they have been in the clan nor what level they are.

How about you 2 have a clan battle then?

What's that got to do with anything?

no