Basically, I see like 2 people out of 20 that don't agree with me. Most people in this discussion agree with me, but they're saying that others don't.
There's enough to fill multiple diplomacy games, obviously, otherwise they wouldn't be a thing.
Someone said that, and that's probably true, but the problem is while they're waiting people that don't follow the rules join and the people that like the games get mad and possibly even quit. Yesterday, in one bad game I heard someone say that they were quitting because they haven't been in a good diplomacy game in 3 days. Did you see that? That's not one good real-time game in 3 DAYS!!!
Anyway...lots of diplo games are good
Someone said that, too. If that was the case, why did that guy say they weren't in one good real-time diplomacy game in 3 DAYS?!
Diplos are boring. They take way too long and they defeat the purpose of playing RISK in the first place. To me, this game is about plowing your enemies, not playing United Nations.
That's why I don't join them, and if you don't like them, you shouldn't either.
That is the last thing I'd like to quote. It is the post I agreed with the most.
PLEASE STOP THE DIPLOMACYS!