<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 21 - 40 of 72   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>   
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 12:59:56


Thomas 633
Level 56
Report
If you want to build a successful clan, just play in the events we make.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 13:00:40


Thomas 633
Level 56
Report
that;s an example
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 14:04:54


Fateless
Level 56
Report
That's not bragging, dude. It's the simple truth. If you want a strong clan, get them involved in the community. Events hosted by Apex, MASTERS, WG, [20] etc are all good places to start.




I tried to get my clan into 1v1, set up a few tourneys etc. Nobody isn't [sic] interested. It seems like we're an FFA clan...!


It takes a lot to motivate people to change. Encourage strat 1v1. Teach it. Study it. Encourage using the ladders. Pull together people who are interested in competition, and work together. Also, you guys should probably boot at least 60 or 70 people from your clan. 90 players is too large to restructure a clan for 1v1 competition. It's not impossible to have a competitive clan of that size, but you need to build the framework for it first, set up the correct leadership model and only then start adding numbers.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 17:28:28


Scotty 
Level 58
Report
Level 5 guy suggesting fundamental change...

...resisting sarcastic comment...

resistance weakening...

weakening...
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 17:30:48


Nex
Level 60
Report
It's obviously an alt. Someone didn't want to have their main account tied to this thread. . .
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 18:37:36


Poseidó̀±nas
Level 58
Report
That could be called 1 of 2 things.

1. Cowardice.
2. Intelligence.
Who's to say it isn't both? :)
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 18:43:45


AbsolutelyEthan 
Level 64
Report
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 20:41:23


Quetz
Level 59
Report
1v1 is perhaps more 'pro' but i think 2v2's and 3v3's have more value, includes more cooperation and wider strategic thinking.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 22:27:31


Kenny • apex 
Level 59
Report
@Thomas: If I wanted to brag, I certainly could in respect to you. The fact is competitive clans have been making competitive events. If you want to become a competitive clan and become part of that community, you can by simply participating. I love it when clans like Blitz form and come into clan league, and then are on their way to being promoted to league A. I'm not saying that the originally blitz guys were bad at the game, but they definitely weren't thought of as a top competitive clan, now they've gotten themselves involved in WSOW, Clan League, and they've grown. It makes me feel pride because that's how I felt when I started. I was playing a 2v2 Round Robin with JSA and we won the tournament, nobody good was in that 2v2 RR, but it felt awesome so I joined [P] only to be slapped in the face with reality that I wasn't good. So I kept playing, I kept watching, I kept getting involved.

Get involved and you'll find it really fun. Don't and you'll just hate what you don't understand.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 23:58:16


Tyrion Lannister
Level 54
Report
true. its sad.

the amount of interesting forum posts is 0.

And the decent clans that focus on rp and social aspects, like W.U., are also quite unknown.

while many clans (like MSG) just span to gain more players.

But I disagree about your opinion that your the hierarchy.

You think your better, cause you better at risk.

Yet no one knows you.

Probably one of the best known players is semicedevine, who is recoqnized for his scenarios.

The real "hierarchy", I believe, is the players who create the most popular games.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-09 23:59:43


Tyrion Lannister
Level 54
Report
also, the majority of players are NOT in CLANS, LADDERS, OR LEAGUES.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:02:32


Thomas 633
Level 56
Report
thankyou
also note how we got ninety members WITHOUT SPAMMING THE FORUMS ABOUT IT *cough* bane *cough*

so shuttup about how we spam the forums about members
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:03:45


Genghis 
Level 54
Report
As I've put it in a humorous thread of mine,

Roman Senate : Warlight Forum posters

Semicedevine is a sham and a terrible scenario creator. Read his Forum posts, he brought shame to wolves in a period when it was still respectable. It's sad not many traverse the forum overall, otherwise they'd probably have renewed perspective on the sceneries of his and the figure himself.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:19:45


Tyrion Lannister
Level 54
Report
still.

most people with recognize his WW 2 scenario.

its probably the single scenario most used by more than one player.

i dont see many scenarios with your name on it.

also, i know semice is an ass.

ive met him.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:20:09


Tyrion Lannister
Level 54
Report
but then again, most people on this game are an ass.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:25:32


Sephiroth
Level 61
Report
im not sure.

is this tyrion lannister trolling.

or is he just retarded.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:34:28


ChrisCMU 
Level 61
Report
It is not all about clans. There are many very good players like Krzychu that are clanless, but they play in competitive tourneys and leagues. If you dont want to be good, fine. Nobody says you have to take this seriously. But if you lay claim to being one of the best clans, then prove it against top clans. Clans are not the only way to get better, but they do push you i think
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:36:00


OnlyThePie
Level 54
Report
I think it's a matter of playstyle. Rest assured, the competitive clans are the best. But there are plenty of small clans, like my own, that don't really play a lot of competitive games, but are just as good to join, if you like our type of games. I do agree that the mega-clans are ridiculous for thinking they are the best just because they have the most. If you want to be the best, every single one of your players better be good.
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 00:50:16


AbsolutelyEthan 
Level 64
Report
the only people who join MSF are people who have a sense of humor and willingly join.

MSF is all about harmony:
On the subject of skill and social hierarchy: 2015-04-10 01:14:43


Hell
Level 5
Report


true. its sad.

the amount of interesting forum posts is 0.

And the decent clans that focus on rp and social aspects, like W.U., are also quite unknown.

while many clans (like MSG) just span to gain more players.

But I disagree about your opinion that your the hierarchy.

You think your better, cause you better at risk.

Yet no one knows you.

Probably one of the best known players is semicedevine, who is recoqnized for his scenarios.

The real "hierarchy", I believe, is the players who create the most popular games.




How dumb can you get??? Those who are good at Warlight, are the top tier of the social hierarchy. Consider this: who made strat 2v2's map? [20]. Who made Guiroma's map? [20]. Who made Strategic Greece's map? [20]. You play on the maps that top players made and yet you think they are unknown??????????



MSF is all about harmony:

You are an amazing liar. But that's about it.




also note how we got ninety members WITHOUT SPAMMING THE FORUMS ABOUT IT


Debatable. You didn't spam the forums about recruitment .... or did you?

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/75418-royal-falcons-now-recruiting

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/81916-trf


And even if you didn't spam the forums about recruitment , YOU'RE STILL SPAMMING THE FORUMS IN EVERYTHING ELSE.
Posts 21 - 40 of 72   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>