for those of you that don't check Uservoice regularly..

I see a difficulty with D cards used in team games.. where you make plans without noticing that one of your teammates isn't currently fighting someone due to it, etc.

please check out my idea.

http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1419927-diplomacy-card-modifications

I have a curious question to the original players and fizzer himself..

why is diplomacy card not allowed to be between teammates? there could be times when it could be strategicly important to prevent teammates from capturing each others territories, *ie, no gift cards and i know 1 owns all but 1 of a bonus and the other owns that one*
perhaps instead there should be a warning that they are teammates instead of a pure restriction to the fact? curious if it was intended to prevent people from making an obvious mistake, or keep such an occurance from happening..

Diplomacy between teammates just because that wasn't aligned with the spirit and goal of the card. But I agree it would be an interesting option. The way it's implemented would mean that teammates couldn't even transfer armies back and forth, which would be really powerful.

sounds understandable, just wanted to throw the idea out, perhaps an option under the card?

I was just trying it in a 2x2 where the stronger apponant killed me in his p's bonus. Before he could move back out I wanted to use diplomacy so he couldn't recapture the bonus. I didn't realize it wasn't possible either.

Sounds more like sorcery than diplomacy.

BP, no more then a forced diplomacy between two enemies that have no reason to be peaceful...