Warzone

Reviews

Review by

on 12/8/2014.

Class, very good map. From what I see this has good accuracy but its hard to check when there is so many bonuses and territories. You've finally done clean borders and changed the colours for bonuses. The design is good, obviously a big map limits artwork. Perhaps you should add boats though?

I'm not a fan of the isolated Kingdoms like Ethiopia and those in South middle-East. The blank grey spaces in the east just look a bit weird. The cities are a nice addition, maybe a bit crammed in the north though.

I've given it 4 stars, because it looks very nice. However solely for diplo and role-play.

24 out of 27 people found this review helpful.

Review by ♕DominatusⓉⒸ on 12/22/2014.

Excellent strategic fun with a lot of useful choke points. You have to learn that big bonuses aren't everything, and teamwork is highly necessary in multiplayer games when trying to take down powerful players.

I found through playing this map and testing that the East is very beneficial for bonuses, but is spread very thin and can be easily overtaken by players coming in from the North (Russia), Middle (Sicily) and the South (Africa. The West meanwhile boasted some good chokepoints and defensive positions.

Overall, great map and a congratulate you and thank the creator for putting time into making this such a blast for me and other players.

-Dominatus
WarLight Player

13 out of 16 people found this review helpful.

Review by Captain Carrot on 12/4/2014.

Very nice, very long
Some bugs though:
Bug: Southern Ardeche doesn't connect to Avignon
Bug: Coastal Logudoro connected (albeit not touching) with Central Sardinia

7 out of 7 people found this review helpful.

Review by Жұқтыру on 8/25/2016.

I still think that the Caucaus should be filled with the Cumans and Kypchaks that were there. Also, I think you should fill the African and Arabian coasts with the tribes that lived there. Principality of Galicia and Halych? They weren't close at all; the reason they unified in 1200 was because Halych annexed Galicia.You should make seperate boni. Also, more minor details: Instead of the Moonsund archipelago being named Dagö and Ösel, you should rename it to the Estonian names, Hiiumea and Saaremea, since there wasn't really a Swedish/Danish presence on the island. Also, perhaps Indian coast? (Though you might offend someone by saying Hinduism is paganism, though I think it fits the definition). Also, check where you're placing your territories, it feels as though the Belarus-Western Ukraine area is a bit off.

Eastern Crete - Chandax
Western Cyprus - Limisol
Eastern Cyprus - Famagusta
Principality of Polozk - Principality of Polotsk or Polock

Otherwise, well done. 3/5

15 out of 24 people found this review helpful.

Review by

8th Road Army on 1/8/2015.

Missing connection between Vodice and Spilt near the Zeta bonus

5 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

Review by

NinjaNic

on 12/29/2014.

Nice!!
Central Sardinia connects to coastal Logudoro.
Missing connection in rome - Trastevere W, Trastevere E.

5 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

Review by Tarrow25 on 12/8/2014.

A well put together map, if only held back by being so damn large. Recommended for 16 players

3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

Review by Leedopo on 12/8/2014.

The overlapping bonuses and options for Diplo games are fantastic!

5 out of 7 people found this review helpful.

Review by Nathan

on 12/15/2014.

Incredible map. I love the four cities being set off in individual areas, and especially the use of outskirts to provide more than one entrance to each city. There are obviously a ton of possibilities here. Great work.

There are, unfortunately, a few broken/unintended connections. I did not keep track of them, but I remember a few. Check Pantheon N in Rome. Also Split-Vodice is broken. Zhukopa-Solnechny, also. Not sure if Mullsjo should connect to Anneby. Northern Soria should not connect to Northern Zaragoza. Also, Northern is misspelled in Northern Soria.

I can't recall any others, but there were maybe 1-2 more I noticed.

5 out of 7 people found this review helpful.

Review by Jesus

on 12/16/2014.

Northern Teruel and Northern Guadalajara are not connected like they appear to be. This should be fixed.

3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

Review by

bloomis

on 3/3/2020.

A really great map, one of the best on here.

3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

Review by otinanaimail on 12/3/2014.

nice map

7 out of 12 people found this review helpful.

Review by JHsia27 on 1/19/2015.

goog

3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

Review by Generalkarl on 2/18/2015.

Superb, many variables and dynamic gameplay

2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

Review by hhehehe123456 on 3/5/2015.

Very nice

2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

Review by

Trogdor on 4/1/2019.

One of the greatest maps, and one of the first, that I have ever played. It is certainly timeless, and it seems that you can hardly go a week without finding it in the "Open Games".

1 out of 1 person found this review helpful.

Review by

҈ * TeeMee123҈ * on 1/6/2015.

5/5 bretty good. A very big map, which can mean games take ages, and with the massive land mass they can also get a bit boring, brilliant diplo setting though which makes up for the landmassness. I must note that the level of accuracy in design and borders is of high standard.

2 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

Review by Yksisarvinen on 12/5/2014.

Very good medieval map :)

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

Review by Gerbil Dance on 5/8/2015.

I really like the idea of a mini map of cities which take place in otherwise small sections of the map. I can't really speak to the intricacies of gameplay, but I really wish I could create this game at a lower level so I didn't have to find someone else setting it up.