North America Diplomacy

Nice, but diplomacy players might like a scenario distribution.
Good map!

I don't generally enjoy diplomacy games, but that doesn't affect my rating here. As NinjaNic has already pointed out, this map is in dire need of some equitable distributions. Until that happens, it is virtually unplayable, except perhaps in a choose-your-own territory setup.

And while this next issue can be corrected (with effort) by individual players, I question the method used to determine the value of the territories. Being from Iowa (which only got a 1), I may have a chip on my shoulder, but I wonder how Victoria Island and Baffin Island rate 3 armies per turn (the same as Alaska!) when so many far more productive areas grant only 1-2 armies.

Other ratings I question:
- Ohio (1 army per turn) - suggestion - 4
- Montana (4) - 2
- Southern Illinois (4) - 1
- South Virginia (3) - 1
- Maine (3) - 2
- Nova Scotia (3) - 2
- Labrador (3) - 1
- Georgia (2) - 4
- New Jersey (3) - 5
- Iowa (1) - 3
- New Mexico (3) - 2
- Upstate NY (4) - 2
- W. Virginia (4) - 2

There are others, but these are worst IMO

I'm sorry I mean no offense, but this needs major work done to it. It just looks very weird and 'bad' :p. Here's some examples:

- You have split up Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota, yet no other states. Not even bigger ones like Texas or California. What's the logic behind that?

-Major spelling issues:
Europa - its Europe.
Belice - Belize. It doesn't stop there....

-Sud?America is at a weird slant?

-Edges/lines/borders are very ugly messy looking things.

I've been a bit harsh, but you cant learn without harsh critics. ATM its worth 1/5. Best of luck on other maps, if you do any more.

This game is good. I have to agree with the previous posts about territory splicing and point accumulation. The worst thing I have to say is this, English is the language of Warlight. Most players do not appreciate that this is in a different language. :(

No challange

Excellent map but very difficult