Talk:Superbonuses: Difference between revisions
Techpriest (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It isn't illegal. It just seems improper. --[[User:Techpriest|Techpriest]] ([[User talk:Techpriest|talk]]) 19:06, 2 September 2013 (PDT) | It isn't illegal. It just seems improper. --[[User:Techpriest|Techpriest]] ([[User talk:Techpriest|talk]]) 19:06, 2 September 2013 (PDT) | ||
That doesn't make sense. English may not be my mother language, but I know that creating new compound words is not illegal, as long as they're readable. Super bonuses is incorrect because super is a prefix, not an adjective. It should be placed directly before the word. Or do you say Super Man, even though Superman is no real word either? --[[User:Moros|By Moros]] ([[User talk:Moros|talk]]) 12:36, 11 September 2013 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:36, 11 September 2013
Superbonus or super bonus?
I always say superbonus, and the forum seems to agree with me. Why is it called super bonus on this page? --By Moros (talk) 00:48, 31 August 2013 (PDT)
Because superbonus isn't a word. "Super Bonus" is two words however. --Techpriest (talk) 16:08, 1 September 2013 (PDT)
And why is creating new words illegal? --By Moros (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2013 (PDT)
It isn't illegal. It just seems improper. --Techpriest (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2013 (PDT)
That doesn't make sense. English may not be my mother language, but I know that creating new compound words is not illegal, as long as they're readable. Super bonuses is incorrect because super is a prefix, not an adjective. It should be placed directly before the word. Or do you say Super Man, even though Superman is no real word either? --By Moros (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2013 (PDT)