Also we are not so lax with our laws.

U.S makes tougher laws, rest of the world shouts about oppression.
U.S makes more lax laws, rest of the world shouts about anarchy.

Can't please everyone I guess...

Ehm...No?-I am OK with suppressed minorities going amok.

And those 3 were not different cases....In all three an unarmed Afro-American-one was a student,one a child,not sure about #3-got shot dead by a WHITE police man.

Yeah....Some of
laws like yozr speed limits are :/
And the Guantanamo-"thingie"is not fine either....tough....I think Germany needs one to....for the conservative^^

I didn't even try to stereotype
US-Americans to fat,lazy and asocial...

.I think Germany needs one to....for the conservative^^

Are conservatives like the boogeyman to you? Do you tremble under your covers every night afraid that the mean old conservative is going to jump out of the closet and take all your rights away?

Well,they could indeed built up a dictatorship
over night....with no one even recognizing it....

Wow. All this from a post titled "Trump is gonna win"

BTW Irony, earlier you commented on my opinion of Kasiech/Fiorina
That was someone else's opinion. I know next to nothing about Kasiech (like how to spell his name) and I dislike Fiorina

I'm the weirdo who likes Rand Paul.

And Dark Knight, America and Europe have done much better as friends than as enemies. Let's be friends, hey?

Missouri was not a racial case. Boston wasn't a shooting, it was a severed spine, and his spine was damaged before he was put in the vehicle (which doesn't excuse the cops from being dickwads and being punished). Wisconsin is not a racial case.

Edited 9/14/2015 02:08:14

That was entertaining :3.

Oh boy, American nationalists arguing with antiamericans, how fun.

Anyhow, I haven't payed too much attention to 2012 American elections yet, but for the 2008 American election: Rocky Andersen (no chance of winning, though; in America, he would be called communist.).

Dark Night: EU is American slave, and it's its own fault that it's.
TL: America is not the special, do good country, it's an evil country, just like most countries, and the most active evil country.

In response to a few select people who posted in the last page of this thread: If there's one type of liberal that I hate it's the ones who dedicate themselves to fighting "Teh evul consurvatives". Not everything from the right is bad, and not everything from the left is bad.

I hate when people put up an arrogant attitude and act as if everyone from the other side of the political spectrum is a "nutjob".

I call a spade a spade and a nutjob a nutjob. Right or left doesn't matter. But, statistically speaking, there are in fact more nutjobs on the right. Mix religion into anything and you get a lot of nutjobs. The right's been dipping into that ol' timey religion with gusto for decades and it shows.

But, statistically speaking, there are in fact more nutjobs on the right. Mix religion into anything and you get a lot of nutjobs.

Oh, so you're one of those, "People who believe in things I don't believe in are nutjobs," types.

As I said, I call a spade a spade and a nutjob a nutjob.

Let's clarify things a little, shall we?

George W. Bush: Nutjob or not?
Sarah Palin: Nutjob or not?
Huckabee: Nutjob or not?

Creationist/evolution-denialist: Nutjob or not? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4Cc8t3Zd5E)

Let me know how you respond to these basic questions, and then we can proceed from there.

Edit: In case you're thinking, "Oh, that video is from the 2008 election...", the nutjobbery has not disappeared in the ensuing 8 years: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/america-politicians-evolution-climate-change

Edited 9/14/2015 05:14:07

all there is to say about this thread at this point

Can I just distance myself from the European guy who complained about rare steak? I'd also like to point out that the French eat 'Blu' steak which is fried for two or three seconds on each side and drips blood.

It was a long argument so I forget who said that both sides have nutjobs, but in response; yes, both sides do. Richard Dawkins being a prime example of an insufferable prick who considers himself a liberal (but that social darwinism crap that he shouts sometimes would put him tot eh right of Hitler).

Its not that people who believe in things that I don't believe in are nut jobs. Religion is probably the best example, its when people decide that they can decide laws for other people based entirely on their faith; gay marriage, teaching creationism etc., that pisses me off.

The Jesus of the bible was an anti-establishment, free health care giving, critic of the rich, taxman defending, opponent of the death penalty. Why are the right against all of those things but in favour of imposing laws based off one or two lines in the O.T. that impinge on the freedoms of others?

That is why I call them nutcases. This is in no way endemic to Christianity, all religions have fundamentalists that do this.

To whoever it was that said that the US lost Vietnam because they didn't invade it enough; are you serious? The US could not have won that war unless they had nuked the country into the sea! The Vietnamese had already repulsed the Japanese and the French (twice) before teh US jumped in, it was always going to go wrong because conventional armies cannot beat Guerrilla warfare without the support of the local people.

No one has ever done it. Spain beat Napoleon, coining the name Guerrilla, Ireland beat the Brits, Afghanistan beat the USSR - and the US didn't exactly win their war there either. Throwing more men into a dense, burning, jungle to walk over mines and shoot civilians (accidently or otherwise) would have only killed more American and angered the Vietnamese further.

Considering many wars since WW2 have been capitalist/communist dick measuring contests...
(seriously.)
I think it would have been possible to win Vietnam if they had really tried. Dropping 2,000 ton conventional explosives could have leveled Hanoi. Of course, this is a terrible idea.

America dropped more bombs over Vietnam than they dropped in all of world war 2. Leveling Hanoi would achieve very little, it might oust the government but that isn't even the first step in winning a war, as demonstrated by Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Vietnam is unbeatable without public support from the locals, dropping more bombs kills more civilians which pisses off more people who then support the Vietcong...and the circle repeats.

STOP BOMBING RANDOM PEOPLE IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK
Sincerely,
{NI] Lord eKell

Europe, we are the monster you have created. And we have learned well. The golden age of Europe is coming to an end and with it Rome itself. The next 85 years will be determined by the actions of so few, and so very many. You are not included on the list of those who's actions matter. Toodle loo chaps!

Trump hopes to build a huge wall to compensate for his much smaller ____.