you should uservoice that chris

I rebember he mantioned it, said no but thought about votes expiring after some time.

Uservoice everything! No more seriously, if Fizzer doesn't actually attempt to solve any popular uservoice so to speak, how can we trust him? The divide between the device put in place for us to voice our opinions and between Fizzer's response to them, is very disappointing, and will only result in a diminishing community that is not allowed growth.

That is not in my immediate roadmap Seph.

Sultan - no, he was asked about clearing out all the user voice stories and starting over and said no.

I'm not asking him to do that. I'm asking him to reject stories that he has given a firm NO to. And to combine stories that are very much overlapping.

He also said on there he has no plans to put the old ladder back or have any poll on it. So those two stories I linked should be rejected as well. Clearly the only path forward on those two is to have the CLOT, get a thread with a link to it promoted, and possibly some day he will make it more visible than a promoted thread.

I guess my point is that most of the time, there is no resolution to stories on User Voice (because he may or may not get to them at some point). But on the ones I listed, there has been a resolution in his statements, but no resolution on User Voice.

If there is somebody here with OCD, some free time and s good heart - could you make a script from that broadcast including most important answers? In the form of Q/A.... It is really hard to glance through that 3h of seepaking, also "advanced blocked techniques" and "commnders" mechanisc could be found elsewhere so there is no need to write such things imho...

Also it would be easier to form a new set of question if Fizzer ever hosts similar event...

Please Please Please..... maybe sb from newly formed FAG clan could do that as a proof of his ultimate devotion to Fizzer? 8]


I can help with one:

Q: Will Fizzer answer this question? [Clement Attlee, 2:26:22]
A : No

Edited 1/6/2016 22:15:31

If people are interested, I'm working on writing a transcript of what happened during the video. I'm about a quarter of the way through it.

It allows you to use the "find" capabilities (ctrl+f) to look up questions.

It contains every comment that Fizzer mentioned/talked about, as well as what Fizzer said, and the questions he ignored. It doesn't contain non-question comments if he didn't talk about them.

It more or less looks like this

Fizzer: Blah blah blah

Question 1: Stuff

Fizzer's Answer: Other stuff

Edited 1/7/2016 05:44:23

Qestion: How about we (...) ?
Answer: Yeah, that is a cool idea. You should make it UserVoice and parhaps around 2030 we will do that.

- Thought of a Stream - "You should make it a Uservoice!"

- Sentence of the Stream - "Good idea, maybe!" or "Anything is possible" - Yeah Right!

- Fact of the Stream - "Allegdly" 100 000 daily players. And yes, Fizzer eats Pizza and worked in Microsoft.

- Update of the Year 2015 - Fixed Color superiority Achievement! Took months to Fix :) Was high-priority.

- Direction of Warlight - non-strategic, click and commit game. As long its not Freemium its worth playing, but not for being Strategy (at least not in standard comprehensions).

- Result of the Stream - Nothing suggested would never get done, except the 2030 ".." update.

- New upcoming achievement: Count the number Fizzer says "You should make it a Uservoice" in 2016?

- Politically correct answer of the Stream - No issue in map ratings!

---

A little sarcasm should not hurt anyone, not even a developer! Great game, but more problems than solutions. Really disappointed over the last update! I guess the Local-Deployment Click bonuses were only thing worth mentioning, and obviously Color superiority - could not argue here!