The player income charts have been updated in the original post and here they are as well.
@MotD, I also don't think you should do away with 3v3. But there was a significant problem with the income from the game types. Almost universally the 2v2 and 3v3 players are unprofitable or barely profitable because of the income being split between players. With income at 3 for 1v1, 4 for 2v2 and 5 for 3v3, only 1v1 are profitable. As well, for Division B you made 1v1 worth 1, 2v2 worth 2 and 3v3 worth 3. In division B the income is the same per player per game whereas in Division A 2v2 and 3v3 games have less income per player per game.
To fix this, Division A should have income of 3 for 1v1, 6 for 2v2 and 9 for 3v3. It is the fair way for assigning income.