Cruz's principles are very close to our original leaders

Aye, and your original leaders had slaves. While your leaders had slaves, us Scots were trying to set ourselves free! English bastards.

+1 Islam
-1 Christianity
+1 Socialism
+1 Independence
-1 Republicans
+1 Sturgeon
+1 Corbyn
+1 Sanders
-1 Capitalism
+1 Tolerance
-1 Hypocrisy
+1 Napoléon (really good leader to be honest; he was incredibly tolerant for a dictator)
+1 Scotland
+1 Wallace & Bruce
-1 America
-1 Bush/Blair war criminals
+1 Marx
-1 Cruz
-1 Trump
-1 Scottish labour twats
+1 UK Labour cool guys

American founders did fuck up America; they created it

America and its citizens are intolerant

Go Scotland

Alba gu brath

Even England is better than America

Edited 3/30/2016 17:50:43

American founders did fuck up America; they created it

If it weren't for us, Ox, you'd be speaking German. You lot couldn't even beat England, much less the Krauts.

If it weren't for us, Ox, you'd be speaking German.

Classic American. Then they ask us why we stereotype them.

Are you saying I'm wrong?

+1000 Okabe

Speaking German is the BEST part about being ruled by Nazis. And plus, The USSR saved our sorry arses, not USA.

The USSR couldn't do shit without US supplies. And while they did a lot, Britain was fucked without the US

and yes, We definitely could beat England.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bannockburn



We destroyed those arseholes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wars_of_Scottish_Independence

Pretty successful here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_the_Bruce

Good lad.

I could link more than Wikipedia if you wanted me to, but here all this stuff is common knowledge. We destroyed the English in every battle we've had with them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Falkirk

Edited 3/30/2016 18:24:26

England is right, Scotland is left. (Reminds you of politics, eh?)

Wow, such a defeat. Slightly more than the enemy were killed. Much loss.

Edited 3/30/2016 18:26:44

@General,

...doing what Muhammad did.

Do tell. What did he do exactly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banu_Qurayza

UK is a mutual loss. We all hate each other and English folk don't really want us anyway.

Lmao, you had your king be England's king, there was no conquest. Stop being a whining nationalist, you're not being oppressed and Scotland isn't a occupied country.

I doubt the English hate your oil money m8. Maybe the stigma of your simple-mindedness, but other than that, it's the Scots who bitch

Yes, but since only 5k died from 150000 trials, it was hardly an instant death sentence.

I had the chance to visit a museum about Inquisition in Santillana del mar, and I can assure you it is better to die for some people seeing what they have to endure, during this period they were very inventive in terms of torture... Unmatched even by modern Jihadists trust me, fortunately these terrorists are not that fond of history and certainly never heard of all these machines that were created for torture. So you see in terms of cruelty Jihadists were not the worst.
And again, you are talking about 5000 deaths of people sentenced to death, but Inquisition directly or undirectly caused the deaths of thousands if not millions of people in Europe and America. Spain used to be inhabited by a majority of Muslims (something like 8 millions in the most glorious period of Al Andalus), what happened to them? Many of them had to be forced to conversion or enslaved, but also many of them (and we can count it in millions) were slaughtered.

They were mostly expelled to Africa I think.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banu_Qurayza

Looks like you didn't even read your own linked article. Provide better evidence please. It clearly says - and to the best of my knowledge, it's correct - that they were punished for sedition and attempted treachery. Moreover they had engaged in treacherous actions, on lower scale, for years. Or are you arguing the severity of the punishment?

Edited 3/30/2016 18:44:44