What are you guys' thoughts on LGBT stuff. See, Gen Numbnuts, I've written something Felinism is pro-LGBT rights, caninism is against it. PS I am gay. Judge me as you will. I don't piticularly give a damn, bitches. If you are homophobic, I recommend you shoot yourself.

I second the notion that anyone against LGBT can shoot themselves.

Edited 9/14/2016 19:01:39

Mmm, you are a attention seeker.

You telling people to kill themselves because they don't think like you? Very narrow minded.

Your argument was subpar. You didn't really cover anything related to LGBT. You merely stated that Cats are for LGBT while dogs are against it. Biased statement backed with zero proof.

You clearly give a damn because you're making a big show of LGBT by feeling the need to make more than 1 thread to draw attention to LGBT and yourself. Very selfish.

Oh you're gay? Good for you.

Downvoted.

Edited 9/14/2016 19:07:58

I recommend anyone who recommends someone shoots himself should shoot himself.

LGB I am completely fine with. Is it a choice? Is it biological? I don't give a shit.

T is where I get kind of iffy about, specifically when it comes to that bathroom crap. I don't want a woman using the men's bathroom; in that scenario I don't care what she thinks she is. I can barely relax myself enough to take a piss when other men are around. It would be impossible if there was a woman in the room. It doesn't make it better if she says "don't worry, I'm a man inside," because the eyes can't see inside; all they see are people in the same room as you all trying to take a piss. There's also no way to prove that someone is really telling the truth when they say they feel like this gender instead of the one they really are. Just trusting their words would be grounds for a bunch of creeps to score.

When asking a question, give your own opinion without purposefully offending or insulting any potential opponents of the mind.

Edited 9/14/2016 19:14:42

Isn't felinism against human sexuality and thus inherently homophobic?

I won't judge you on the fact that you're gay, not at all.

piticularly

However I will judge you on the fact that you're supposedly a native of the UK, and don't know how to spell words like "particularly".

Actually, overall your grammar is comparable to that of a 7 year old. Let's dissect it!

What are you guys' thoughts on LGBT stuff.

Actually correct use of an apostrophe. Good job :D However, missing question mark makes you lose points.

See, Gen Numbnuts, I've written something Felinism is pro-LGBT rights, caninism is against it.

I can excuse the obvious logical fallacy here and how your "Felinism is pro-LGBT rights and since we hate Caninism they must be against it!" statement is completely illogical.

But what I can't excuse the random assortment of words that you try to form into a sentence. Let's read that again, "I've written something Felinism is pro-LGBT rights, caninism is against it". While a semi-colon can replace that comma, what is actually inexcusable is the "something Felinism" part. How did that make any sense in your head? They are just words!

PS I am gay.

While it might look like there are no flaws to begin with, this sentence is excruciating. Firstly, it is not natural at all. In a conversation (or a written paragraph), you wouldn't drop a random "HEY I'M GAY" as a whole other sentence between the two main points in your paragraph. Additionally, the "PS" is absolutely unnecessary. Moreover, there's absolutely no comma to make the sentence make sense alone. "PS, I am gay" would be the more acceptable form of this monstrosity.

Judge me as you will.

This would look a lot better as "Judge me, as you will.", but clearly, you hate commas. Don't forget the fact that this is a completely unnatural way to talk in English (maybe it would be acceptable in the 1800s). "Judge me as you will". Repeat that. Now repeat it without that 60 year old, posh English man voice in your head. You can't? That's what I thought. In no dialect is this form of making sentences actually common, and you sound like a spastic by saying "as you will" instead of "if you want". "Judge me if you want to" / "I don't care if you judge me" are far better alternatives to the abortion of semantics that this "sentence" is.

I don't piticularly give a damn, bitches.

Obviously there's the spelling at flaw here, but otherwise, this sentence looks alright. An exclamation mark could be used to actually express some emotion since clearly OP is quite triggered, but that's irrelevant. I want to touch on the fact that OP's sentences have been so short. Is idontlikecaninism disabled? I hope he isn't, because that would be mean of me to be so harsh to him, then.

If you are homophobic, I recommend you shoot yourself.

The first phrase in this sentence was going so well! It's such a shame that he fucked it up in the latter part of it. "I recommend that you shoot yourself" would make you sound like a native speaker, and not a monkey with Parkinson's slamming his wrists on the keyboard.

Oh also, for such a topic praised by liberals like LGBT, idontlikecaninism is very clearly quite authoritarian, in this way:

"YOU ARE A CANINIST SO YOU ARE DUMB."

"IF YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION THAN ME YOU SHOULD SHOOT YOURSELF."

"I AM TOO PERSISTENT. WAAAAAAAAAAAAH!"

Anyway, that was enough making fun of this piticular accident. It's a shame Miss Carriage doesn't always come when the downies are in the womb.

Edited 9/14/2016 19:40:11

Scottish man is both Scottish and a grammar nazi. +1 Ox.

you've already made a thread about this subject today but it got downvoted. Thoughts on reducing spam, no?

shoot yourself you insolent mudcrab.

I was going to comment but Martin covered most of what I wished to convey - are we still allowed to +1 with upvoting? =P

(Although the bathroom stuff is more of a sideline issue)

Could someone link the first thread?

The one and only LGBT:
Liberty
Guns
Beer
Titties

Edited 9/14/2016 21:36:44

No need to, its imaginary

I retract my statement on agree with him on shooting yourself, it's crass. However, I will say that anyone that has a problem with LGBT is a bigot. I don't care what your reason is, it's shameful and it makes you a bigot. There is also no room for "well I'm fine with these guys, but idk about these guys man." Either your inclusive or you're not. You can't be partially inclusive. You might not want to change your gender, and maybe you don't understand why someone would, but that doesn't mean you get to pass judgement on whether or not transgenders get to be like the rest of us. Who is any of us to pass that kind of judgement on anyone?

Edited 9/14/2016 22:11:22

I wasn't talking specifically to you, cat.

I'm all pro LGBT rights, but it's absurd that you just pull such a stupid speech out of nowhere.

First you assume there's such a thing as felinists and caninist factions with different ideologies, which is totally stupid. Why the fuck a cat owner would defend gay rights and a dog owner would be against it? Owning a pet doesn't force you to an ideological group.

Secondly, you complain about people not respecting your choices and from prejudice, and yet you do the same to caninists (whatever this is lol) saying they are anti-LGBT rights before saying homophobes should shoot themselves, implying thus that if you are a canninist you should kill yourself. That is a discusting thing to say.

You complain about people not repecting you as a gay and then imply that canninists should kill themselves. You are no better than a person that would tell you to kill yourself for being gay.

Not only rightwingers have extremists in their ranks...

Lmao Sultan

Edited 9/14/2016 22:21:07

i don't think muslim countries should be killing them

but i don't know about this whole calling trannies 'women' thing

caitlyn jenner is a dude. i will always refer to him as a dude because that's what he is.