Trump is going to win, whether you like it or not.

Ty.

Uplisted and Whitevoted

Trump's most certainly not going to win. You can stop lying to yourself. Even Trump knows his run is over.

I don't know what polls you've been looking at. Here's one that predicted 99/100 states accurately in the past 2 elections.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

To say that this poll is rigged, also implies that the last 2 elections were rigged. To say that those elections were rigged, also implies that the 2004 election was rigged, where a Republican won.

Feel free to not make a fool out of yourself.

The election is certainly rigged.

Rigged against the American people that is, we lose either way.

A middle-of-Minnesota journalist schools the AP.

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/column-dishonest-media-your-bias-is-showing/article_87c1c224-9895-11e6-be9a-ffefc56d2eab.html?mode=jqm

That journalist didn't school anyone.

They claim referencing Trump's claims as being unsubstantiated is biased. It's not. If they had evidence or proof Trump would have supplied it, he did not.

Again, his claims that she was on drugs were baseless. They had no foundation in fact, that is what baseless means.

All that reporter did was attempt to gain attention by critiquing something it knew was divisive, thus knowin that as a result they'd gain themselves followers.

Rigged against the American people that is, we lose either way.

Yeap. All four options are hot garbage. By far the worst candidates I can recall in my lifetime. A half decent candidate from either side would be running away with the polls (which Hillary kind of is already).

Have to wonder if the people who could actually do the job well have any interest in doing it. I know I certainly would want zero part of the presidency given what it takes to get to that stage of politics.

the worst candidates I can recall in my lifetime

uh if you're over 8, I think George Bush definitely has a claim to this.

Nope. Not even close. Bush at least had some executive experience, something neither of these have. Also wasn't widely reviled as these two are. I'd probably take 2004 Bush over 2016 Clinton and definitely over Trump

Bush at least had some executive experience

I don't know what you mean, but Clinton was State Minister?

I'd probably take 2004 Bush over 2016 Clinton

and what about 2000 Bush? It's the same fellow. The one who brought America back in bloody wars again on 1. an avoidable and possibly wanted cause for it (the September 11 attacks) and 2. the one who invaded Iraq on made up claims? And went to war with a core power?

Edited 10/27/2016 00:21:32

Secretary of State is not an executive position. Not in the same way in which President or Governor is. Secretary of State is a subordinate and not the boss. Bush was previously governor of Texas, thus the executive experience that neither candidate has.

Went to war with a core power? I miss something?

Man had his flaws, no denying that. Still would rather him running than either of the current turds.

To say that this poll is rigged, also implies that the last 2 elections were rigged. To say that those elections were rigged, also implies that the 2004 election was rigged,

Wrong. Not going to debate whether or not election is rigged, but just because one election was rigged does not mean the election before was rigged.

That's like saying a person ate pizza yesterday for lunch because they are eating it today for lunch.

Yuno, while your point is correct, you cut off some of the initial point which provided context.

The initial point indicated that fivethirtyeight successfully predicted 99 of the previous 100 state ballots. They are currently predicting a sizable victory for Clinton. If the election is rigged and they are lying then it stands to reason that the previous two would also have been rigged or else they would not have been so accurate.

wrong.

hey guys:
1. Most polls oversample or have some sort of pro-Clinton bias
2. RCP uses these polls and even ones like the ABC/WSJ one with Clinton +12
3. I assume Nate Silver looks at these faulty polls
4. Nate Silver/538 got Trump wrong entirely in the primaries.
5. They also made other mistakes in the primaries (ie Democrat race for Michigan).
6. Many Trump supporters are closest due to liberal bullying.
7. Trump has WAY more voter enthusiasm.
8. Guy who does not use faulty polling says Trump favored heavily https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/world/not-yet-donald-trump-will-win-says-top-forecaster/
9. Polls fucked up Brexit and others just recently.
10. Betting following Brexit pattern - many small bets on Trump and less but larger bets on Hillary.

Clinton shills BTFO

^

Always have to laugh when people attack polls as being biased when they don't agree with their desired outcome but when they do align, they are clearly unbiased.

Makes perfect sense! Totally believable!

I'll be surprised if Hillary ends up with fewer than 300

Edited 10/27/2016 02:13:40

There is actual proof of leftists polling more Hillary supports than Trump supporters to fit their agenda.

Look how many people show up for Trump rallies and how many show up for Hillary.

I'm gonna laugh so much when Trump wins and all you lefties cry.

Edited 10/27/2016 02:35:11