Nice apology. Appreciate the sincerity.

MH is announcing a substitute:

Biomes 3v3:
georgie out
Mylo in

Sub for M'H has been noted, replacement replacement games have been made (see 4th post of the thread) and i'm in the middle of exams so i can't update right now, so sorry rak if my name mislead you once again.

i was hoping for an update when i saw farah posted

me too :-)

In the meantime, here's a booting chart. Note, I only included completed games.

Stats will do 2 substitutions:

3v3 Biomes:
OUT: Gus squared
IN: BMT216A

2v2 Cookies:
OUT: Gus squared
IN: Nick

Despite the necessity to sub, we would like to thank Gus for all the efforts, both in games in both the previous seasons and for helping me organizing everything this season and last season. Your contribution was appreciated and will be missed.

cowboy your statistics are wrong :p (unless you don't count boots under the new system after fizzer's update as boots)

Edited 4/9/2019 21:47:16

Outlaws would like to make a substitution.

On 1v1 Biomes,

Lucien Out and Edge In.

I'll confirm Plat's message in case some idiot complains he's not an official contact.

He's not an official contact.

Does this mean we can ban platty?

I'll confirm Plat's message in case some idiot complains he's not an official contact.

He's not an official contact.

This exchange has me wondering purely from a technical point of view. Cowboy posted this after Bonsai, so does this imply that:
* Cowboy is an idiot?
* Bonsai now thinks Cowboy is an idiot?
* Cowboy wants Bonsai to think that he's an idiot?
* Cowboy is an idiot to everyone who agrees with Bonsai's criterion?
* Further confirmation from Bonsai is needed to confirm whether or not Cowboy is an idiot?

Farah: as a mathematician yourself as well, how would you interpret this from a logical lexical point of view?

Any substitution requests should be made only by clan leaders on the designated forum thread.

Isn't it actually idiotic to call someone idiot for saying that one should follow this?

Bonsai is a grumpy old tree, ignore him. I'm hoping he'll rejuvenate like a waterfall and we'll be one big happy family again.

if any use of formalized predicate logic is done in this tread i blame you math wolf

@math wolf

Yes

Subs for stats and outlaws have been noted.

I'll confirm Plat's message in case some idiot complains he's not an official contact.

He's not an official contact.


This exchange has me wondering purely from a technical point of view. Cowboy posted this after Bonsai, so does this imply that:
* Cowboy is an idiot?
* Bonsai now thinks Cowboy is an idiot?
* Cowboy wants Bonsai to think that he's an idiot?
* Cowboy is an idiot to everyone who agrees with Bonsai's criterion?
* Further confirmation from Bonsai is needed to confirm whether or not Cowboy is an idiot?

Farah: as a mathematician yourself as well, how would you interpret this from a logical lexical point of view?

Both wankers.

Shut up before I take your diamond.

Please refrain from the word "Wanker" and instead use the more PG version of "Silly goose".

Hence, Cowboy and Bonsai are both silly gooses.

Cleaner division for all.

This exchange has me wondering purely from a technical point of view. Cowboy posted this after Bonsai, so does this imply that:
* Cowboy is an idiot?
- Yes
* Bonsai now thinks Cowboy is an idiot?
- Yes
* Cowboy wants Bonsai to think that he's an idiot?
- Unconfirmed. But if he is an idiot, he may not be aware of it.
* Cowboy is an idiot to everyone who agrees with Bonsai's criterion?
- Yes
* Further confirmation from Bonsai is needed to confirm whether or not Cowboy is an idiot?
- Done

Both wankers.

wank·er
/ˈwaNGkər/
nounVULGAR SLANG•BRITISH
1) a contemptible person (used as a general term of abuse).
2) someone more than 42 games behind on updates