For the same reason lebron james doesn't play 1 on 1 vs every random person in the world who challenges him

So you have the time to play someone with a 1100 rating, but not with a 1700-1800 rating?

Sounds more like you're afraid to lose.

That's what they all say - and then when I beat them they make excuses and demand that I play them again. Then when I play them again they make more excuses and say I must play best out of five. And on and on.

Being the greatest you learn it's best to simply decline most requests.

The worst is when I get unlucky and they happen to win - then they say I'm not the greatest. Even though it's a game based on luck where the inferior player is going to win at least 10% of the time.

Lose lose for me, really.

"Even though it's a game based on luck where the inferior player is going to win at least 10% of the time."

You're aware szeweningen has an account with 96% winrate, right?

Why isn't he losing at least 10% of the time?

I think he means they'd beat him atleast 10% if the time.

You're aware szeweningen has an account with 96% winrate, right?

Farming noobs doesn't count.

farming noobs doesnt count

If farming noobs doesnt count, then barely any of your wins count, hypocrite

You're aware szeweningen has an account with 96% winrate, right?


Farming noobs doesn't count.

Isn't that what you do.

Well since I am the greatest player this site has ever seen really when I play anybody I'm farming them. So ya, I guess you guys are right.

This noob would be really, really good if he just learned how to play offensive defense a little better

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=4274979

#slayed

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=4275285

"This noob would be really, really good if he just learned how to play offensive defense a little better"

I hope you're kidding.

Picks: He makes 7 picks. He triple picks North/Central America. He doesn't contest the first turn bonus that you get.

Turn 1: He gambles a 3v2 on the attack on Gulf Coast, yet attacks with 2 4v2 attacks elsewhere. The Gulf Coast was the only "must take" attack he does on turn 1, it should have absolutely been 4v2 instead of the attack on Tennessee.

Turn 2: He begins attacking West US before finishing East US, attacking Central America with those excess armies would have been far more sane as then he could have finished East US and Central on turn 3. (East US on Turn 2 if he'd have played turn 1 as I suggested above.)

The only reason he had more income and as many armies as you on turn 7 is because you expanded poorly.

You began deploying in Africa later than you should have.

He's got a lot of natural ability for a clueless noob. Just needs work on his fundamentals and he will be better than 95% of players on this site who are too conservative, too passive and too scared to try and actually win.

Crushing Souls (2013) by Wally Balls

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=4279540

gg gui

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=4288274

gui?

Lolz.

That's not Gui.

75% 1v1 FFS.

Gui on autogames would be more in the 95% range.

I'd have to reverse-cherrypick really really severely (picking the best opponents I could find in the games) to have a 75% 1v1 from autogames and I am not nearly as good as gui at 1v1.

I figure if those are Gui then the current accounts I've been using in autogames is definitely gui:

Ranked Games
Completed 69 ranked games (55 / 69)

1v1: 45 / 55 (82%)
2v2: 6 / 10 (60%)
3v3: 4 / 4 (100%)

Hint: I've lost 10 out of 55, you think Gui would have lost 14, he'd actually likely have lost 2.

Omniscient my friend, you base too much off stats as for one I am "reverse cherrypicking". But no, I am not this gui you speak of.