I predict that that Trump will win after a three month court battle.
Unlikely, his cases have so far been thrown (read: laughed) out of court. The only one that seems to have succeeded so far was in Philly, which led to a two-hour delay over whether the vote counters should stand 10 feet apart or 6 feet apart and affected exactly zero votes. There's actually been some hilarious exchanges from these cases, demonstrating just how little merit the arguments have:
My Google-fu is failing me, but this is a paraphrase of the transcript (from memory) over the bid to halt the count in Philadelphia (Trump campaign was alleging that observers were not being allowed when there were, in fact, official Trump observers in the room at the time):
Judge Diamond: Are there people in that room?
Trump lawyer: Yes.
Judge Diamond: Are there observers from the Trump campaign in that room in an official capacity?
Trump lawyer: Yes
Judge Diamond: I don't get it. What is your problem exactly?
<order denied>
If someone can find the official transcript, would be much appreciated!
Since you didn't bother to actually cite your quotes, here is a link from local media providing context:
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/06/antrim-county-vote-glitch-software-update/6194745002/Because most counties in the state — especially smaller ones — use the Dominion Voting Systems equipment that Antrim County does, concerns were raised this week about whether other county results could have been posted with errors.
But that's not the case, according to the Department of State, which stressed in the news release that the votes were correctly tabulated and the printed tapes showing the results were also accurate in Antrim.
"In order to report unofficial results, county clerks use election management system software to combine the electronic totals from tabulators and submit a report of unofficial results," the release said. "Because the clerk did not update software, even though the tabulators counted all the ballots correctly, those accurate results were not combined properly when the clerk reported unofficial results."
How exactly does this software glitch make the case that Trump would be able to recover (at this point) 53 EVs in court? Are you trying to confuse people into believing baseless allegations of widespread fraud with a news story about an already-fixed software glitch that did not change ballot tabulation and had no impact on the official count?
Edited 11/7/2020 05:22:59