Probably all of the wilf coted for MoD already


I think Mod is pretending to be a seer but maybe a wolf
Eh?

Edited 8/26/2014 16:21:32

Just to clarify, I thought I could change my vote; I wouldn't have voted so soon otherwise.

It will be very interesting to see who gets eaten on the first night.

Silver, you say the game is lost for the villagers if you die? You're right, that is very arrogant. Each of your posts seems set up to reinforce your own importance within the game.

Now you say you would like two people to be lynched on the first night, the night when we have the least information available to us.

Hey I think Silverr is the traitor since if he persuade MoD and I to be killed , we both habe already told ur roles so that mean he is wolf

cuz villagers would not have vote other villagers since the villagers want to win , unless they were headless chickens

Not to say you're wrong. But what's to stop a wolf from saying they are a seer/angel etc?

Also:

Probably all of the wilf coted for MoD already


I think Mod is pretending to be a seer but maybe a wolf
Eh?

+this a few minutes later?

Hey I think Silverr is the traitor since if he persuade MoD and I to be killed , we both habe already told ur roles so that mean he is wolf

cuz villagers would not have vote other villagers since the villagers want to win , unless they were headless chickens

makes no sense ^^

Edited 8/26/2014 16:34:39

Hey I think Silverr is the traitor since if he persuade MoD and I to be killed , we both habe already told ur roles so that mean he is wolf

cuz villagers would not have vote other villagers since the villagers want to win , unless they were headless chickens

What does http://warlight.net/Profile?p=666001590 have to do with this?

Nothinbto do with him

headless chicken , if u are reading this , sorry

you guys are forgetting that this time there are just 1 or 2 wolfs, bc last time wolfs win easily.

Would the Wolves please raise their hands ?

I think MMB is a villager but he is so retarded it makes no difference whether he dies. I think we can expect wolves to take out soft targets like him though. Unless they risk killing prominent members (because angel will protect some). I think No Balls is the only certain wolf. Because his attitude is completely changed - it cannot just be that he is a sore loser from last game (not his style anyway). If No Balls is a wolf, we can expect MMB to be (but if I'm honest, I think he is serious about liking MMB so he may not be a wolf). Maybe the seer could check out His Balls (lol great line quote away).

Sorry for that post... I can hardly understand it myself but I'm sure you'll get the idea.

Edited 8/26/2014 16:38:13

I'd like to say that Dom365 said an unknown number of u are wolves but I predict is 4 or 5

The lynching of 2 villagers makes no sense at all.

I advocate the lynching of everyone who claims it makes sense.

When I speak I mean in general who I want to be seen dead. I'll have to start paying attention :D

there are multiple seers and angels for those who arent aware.

Now I have to read the thread because I think you are trolling :/

Edit: Nope, he is right.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:05:55

It's not definite that there are multiples of each special villager. There may be one or more of each.

It would be unreasonable for there to be too many imo. Also, I think there is one of each special, but one kind of special may be repeated by the copycat person.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:07:30

I can assure you all that I'm not a wolf.
EDIT: So lynching me in case I'm wrong about all this is silly.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:22:51

Silver posted his last post while I was typing mine.
So i didnt react to his post, but I will address it now.

Silver said the following:

Perfect scenario would be 7-7 tie between MoD and MMB.
If MoD is a wolf and MMB isn't it proves I was wrong, so horribly wrong.
If MoD is a villager and MMB is a wolf it proves I was right, so horribly right.
If both are wolves I'd be super confused about their internal pickering.
If both are villagers I'd just admit I was wrong and that's it.


That is never a perfect scenario

A double lynch would only mean having the chances of two villagers dying first day. How can that be a perfect scenario? The villagers main interest is not getting innocents killed. Every senselessly killed villagers diminishes their chances to prevail. You dont seem to have that interest. You are utterly convinced of your accusations. Yet and this is another suspicous behavior, you dont want to accept any consequences of you being wrong (i admit I was wrong and thats it)
I am a villager myself and I can assure i am almost always uncertain of me being right because of the lack of information i got. You seem so certain. Why?

In my mind that adds up to the following. You are either totally selfconsumed and drowned in your selfimportance and arrogance that you fail to be reasonable enough, or you are just a wolf.

I said certain things about you, because as public person that you presented yourself, I expected some kind of justification or clarification in response to my post. You did not do that. From writing whole pages of accusations you now went to dropping one liners.

So for you (and hisballs) advocating doublelynching, I recomend you and hisballs for lynching. Let that be my testament in the case of me being eaten by wolves this night.

Gnuff. I Dont think it was because there were too many wolves that they won last time. I think it was due to an incompetent village and a few too many players not contributing. Also there is definitely not one wolf as the dynamic of the game would be ruined. I think two would be way to hard for the wolves too. Unlike in real life a definitive record of how everyone voted in the past should really make this game too hard for the wolves if the villagers concentrate.

Lynching of two players is not ideal I just want to see silvers theory burn. How many to vote? What's the current score?

I was joking before but actually arun has arises my suspicion again. Vote arun.

I can assure you all that I'm not a wolf.
EDIT: So lynching me in case I'm wrong about all this is silly.

What prompted that reply was this:

So, my vote is MystermanBalls and if he turns out not to be a wolf, we will vote on Silver next turn, for his convincing advocacy of killing an innocent villager. Lets tie Silvers fate to mysterymanballs.

You were certain that his balls. is a wolf but agreed to vote for MMB anyway.
So in the case of MMB being a villager why derail from that?
Why not vote for his balls. even if MMB turns out to be a villager after today?

We should lynch his balls. tomorrow, almost everyone agreed that he is a wolf so todays outcome shouldn't really matter right?
Unless of course he gets killed/saved/seered over the night.

The villagers main interest is not getting innocents killed.

No the main interest is to kill the wolves.