> Explain your reasoning for thinking that. What would you have suggested? It's pretty easy afterward to have had a simpler resolution based on how the game turned out. But dealing the cards you're handed and without the knowledge of an outside force? A plan that's based on the after the fact!
Still pretty sure those games were bait, and not actually intended to be examples of good play, but sure, I'll bite:
Maybe this analysis will help other players:
https://www.warzone.com/MultiPlayer?GameID=26326867Let's start with picks:
1.) North Africa is terrible. It's 3 income, and the same amount of territories as most of the 4 income bonuses. It doesn't counter anything particularly good either, and even if it did, blind countering with first pick is a bad strategy.
2-3 are okay
4.) Canada is terrible. Inefficient, doesn't counter anything but Greenland, which is also mediocre on this distribution due to having a bad warlord.
5.) West Africa is a bad warlord.
6.) East Africa isn't a great warlord either.
These picks aren't just not amazing, they're genuinely awful. We're talking 1200 elo on the ladder-tier.
Now, on to actual play:
Wasting armies to move into West Africa is silly. Libya has better position to counter East Africa, and only a complete noob would have started in South Africa (or North Africa for that matter).
Not completing Central Russia turn 3 is hilariously bad.
Going into Alaska is silly. No decent opponent is going to be there. Indonesia and East China are both much more likely. Hitting Japan is a much better move with the leftover armies left after taking Central Russia.
Hitting the warlord in West Africa is once again, more stupid wasteful army usage.
Expanding simultaneously into West Africa, Canada, and Caucasus, all while not having completed North Africa is horrific.
Honestly at this point I've got no motivation to continue watching the rest of the game, you played like crap every turn so far, and I don't see that changing any time soon. If you want to improve and genuinely are seeking to improve, I'd be willing to play vs you and give you pointers, but as is, you're not good.
Edited 4/1/2021 05:54:10