> For someone who doesn't care you seem to do a lot of talking about how good you are, while evading backing it up with actual play.
Except, that I don't. Buns was the one that brought up anything about whether I was good. I just rebutted his silly comment. All I initially did was analyze someones linked game. It was incredibly poorly played.
Also, not sure how I evaded backing it up.
Showing my previous 15 games, is pretty much the polar opposite of what you're suggesting.
It's almost like in your mind this is what I posted:
"I could beat people with trophies. I just don't play them. Because it'd be embarrassing for them. I'd win. All the games. Easily."
That's not remotely what I wrote. I can hold my own vs people with trophies. Trophies aren't a good indicator of skill. That's literally all I'm saying.
That's not remotely what I wrote. I can hold my own vs people with trophies. Trophies aren't a good indicator of skill. That's literally all I'm saying.
Only 73.33% winrate vs people with trophies in my past 15 games, wow, I'm trash.
You really think these two statements are equivalent?
