I agree with a min of 6. Otherwise the sample size of that clan is simply too small. Plus it allows two teams for 3s. The small amount we have now means larger clans have to tell many members they cant play

For next season, we will do 6 from each clan, 6 1v1's, 3 2v2's, 2 3v3's. That allows up to 18 players to play which only a couple clans have more than 18 active players I think. If a clan has only four people, they will face a small penalty but not large enough to give them no chance at winning it. The deadlines for lineups in Group A will be June 1. The deadlines for lineups in Group B and C will be June 8. Hopefully the tournametns all get started before June 15.

if you put som many match, you must allowed to a a player to play on both 3v3 for example....

anyway, this time put 5 day autoboot pls, is bad lose point for boot.

jsa, for THIS season still be 4 1v1 2 2v2 1 3v3 or is already 6 1v1 etc?

This season will stay at 4 1v1, 2 2v2, 1 3v3. Too many clans have already submitted lineups to change it. I can put 5 day autoboot I guess, with less players/teams in each round robin, it shouldn't stall the tournament much at all compared to 3 day autoboot.

I agree with a 6 player minimum. I think it makes it so that 2-3 players can't just carry a clan, you need to have some sort of depth to compete.

As to the different tournaments for next season, I would like to see a 4v4 instead of (or along side I guess) the second 3v3. You could use a map like Double Earth.

ps. REGL has 40+ active members (I don't feel like counting right now).

I personally have never seen any good 4v4 templates. 4v4 seems less about skill and more about who gets less bored during the game in the games I have played and watched with it. If you can find or make a good template and people want it, I will add one team of 4v4 for the next clan league.

yeah no 4v4 pls

I'm fine with a 4vs4 template.

Personally I would suggest the following maps for that:
- Eastern Asia
- Poland Big
- Double Earth

4v4 also works well on New York

i think that next map suggested will be quadruel...

>suggesting a map with 4 territories for an 8 player game.

Gnuff, you stole the words right out of my mouth ;)

Also Gnuff, Quadruel only has 4 territories, how do you suppose a 4vs4 will be played?

I think there should be no 4v4, it takes much too long, and if there are 2 3v3s already there is no point. Also it would escalate until we have 6vs6 and then 12vs12.

it is a mistake :P

A massive team game that takes weeks and requires participation and communication from all members of the clan is a better way to judge than a string of 1v1s.

I wouldn't mind 4 1vs1, 2 2vs2 and 2 3vs3 though

But if we don't get a 2nd 3vs3 I would opt for a 4vs4 just to promote good teamplay more.

In my opinion a good clan is supposed to be more then the sum of it's individual members.

play a 4v4 = best player suggest to puppet....

Piggy thinks team games are better than 1v1s? :O

Also Gnuff, that is because whenever you play 4v4 it is you and 3 of your alternates ;)

Not everyone has your time and motivation to explain every single move to all his or her teammates
We all know you're quite impressive with your alts Gnuffone but having said that, I think the majority of games will not be resolved by a singular person suggesting everyone to puppets.