Vote Green

I will see his role one way or another :)

Question: Are any on Arun's list a part of his faction?

I'm flattered Coaleyes, but can someone explain to me what I've done to receive such a following?

WE WANT A MULTILYNCH.

HIS balls and Ace share my desire to kill lurkers. For today they can be trusted. Taisho, I didn't consider that when making the list; it's only the people who mised the first day vote.

Suspicion is thrown upon Green voters like Coaleyes. Disregarding the plan. Protecting lurkers. In the next day you will be scrutinised.

As for the rest of the village,cool low the plan. Vote now. Vote quickly! If you do not vote soon you will be suspected also. When voting, try to balance it. For example voting Erhmantraut is now better than voting Green. We want as many people potentially lynched as possible - only His Balls, Ace and me will remain and we will hammer.

Edited 10/29/2014 11:12:57

I'm absolutly not against killing off lurkers, and would not protect any lurker aside from myself.
Which is why I'm changing my vote from Kasparov to Erhmantraut.

In the interest of self preservation.

I see your point, lurkers can be lynched whether they're villagers or wolves because they wouldn't contribute anything anyway. You suspect me because I didn't support a multi-lynch, but why would you suspect Coaleyes? He voted for me, a 'lurker', when each lurker is going to receive at least 3 votes each anyway.

Edited 10/29/2014 11:18:54

Green, you follow the plan if you are a villager. Change your vote to balence. Remember that trusted villagers are hammering. It's unlikely you will be lynched.

Eliza voters and Coaleyes are suspicious.

...

Unvote : Eliza

now its triple lynch!

Edited 10/29/2014 11:18:31

It's not anything until the day ends. Follow the plan.

Are you happy with my vote now Arun? Or shall I change again?

@Taco, no it's just me ahead with 3 votes right now :'(

Edited 10/29/2014 11:31:04

Yes thanks Green.

Why do we want a multilynch? People keep coming out of the woodwork.

Semicedevine could be a Jester, awol Wolf or just a villager who doesn't understand the game.

I vote Eliza for the moment. The inactive list is dwindling, thankfully.

Edit: Why would we want to lynch green? If someone wants a multilynch of inactives vote Alias09 for 2.

Edited 10/29/2014 11:46:10

Arun, this dictatorship is ridiculous. Why are we so hard on lurkers already. In the last game I didn't contribute on the first day and a half. Chill man. Lurkers wont start annoying me or arousing my suspicion for a little while.

I am not part of your little hierarchy and do not support any chance of a multi lynch. If you weren't confirmed...

Also, you are talking as if me and you have discussed this already.

Ohh, right I missed the fact that Arun was confirmed.

Edited 10/29/2014 11:53:47

We don't want to lynch Green but we want to get as many inactives as possible. Therefore voting Eliza is bad (at the moment) as is voting Green.

His Balls, you've seen how long inactives remain. Better to take them out now before other suspicions come into play.

ARUN... what makes you say voting for ELIZA or GREEN is bad?

If the strategy is to get lurkers out... then so be it. Inactives, as well explained in past posts are of no consequence whatsoever.... I have seen Green's comments... but, I have no read Eliza's yet.

HIS BALLS is right. Something fishy you are threading..What is the point to coerce GREEN into changing his vote.. that's dictatorship... Please allow all the villagers to express themselves in whichever way they see it fit.

Just one more question..... if G Arun is a "Dead Villager" how is possible that his spirit still "lurking" around this forum?

Is this against the rules?

No. Not if it compromises the plan.

Voting Green is bad - he is sctive. Voting Eliza is bad - it further unbalances the vote. By balencing we give the confirmed villager greater control.

If somebody finds my post above strange... please check Page 9 of this forum..
http://warlight.net/Forum/Thread?ThreadID=59195&Offset=160