If you win games in less moves, you are usually better
No, because it depends more on your opponent than you. just because the opponent surrenders earlier doesn't make you better.

If your income at the end of the game is 0, you lose. If your income is over 90 you win almost certainly, so if your average is 50, chances are you win most of your games.
You cannot have 0 income on any of the ladders... an income above 30 usually is enough that you've won (with exceptions ofc). and average income is more an effect of how long you keep going, eg if you opponent doesn't surrender early, and you've 5 more turns with +20 that'd drag the avg up.


The whole point of the new coin games is to not have any luck, so bringing it to the ladders would show more skill in first place.
This is the only thing you've said this far that isn't plain stupid (whether i agree or not doesn't matter). However it is completely irrelevant to your other posts.

are there seriously clans who recruit people only if they have gold stars on the tutorial levels? pls tell me which clans that are and remind me te never join those.. If you think a gold star tells anything about skill then you even understand less of this game then you showed so far. Getting a gold star on the single player means only you know how to beat the computer fast and ai plays dumb and predictable. Imho people with a gold star on each level have either to much time on their hands or are scared to meet real opponents

Imho people with a gold star on each level have either to much time on their hands or are scared to meet real opponents AIs are predictable. Humans are very predictable. The whole point of AI is to mimic a human, so your argument is invalid. Also it took me about 45 seconds to star level 1 for an achievement or whatever.

If you think a gold star tells anything about skill then you even understand less of this game then you showed so far

Stating that clans that apply with stars as a factor exist is nothing similar to saying stars show excellence.