@timon92

Thanks for your feedback. The progress (75%) was indeed calculated incorrectly, I just fixed and published a new version for it. It should now state "Almost done" since no new games will be created.

The problem with the others numbers is, that they are from double elimination tournaments. These correctly just consider the best way (win all) and the worst way (lose first, then win all) for the games left, since I couldn't find a good way to reconstruct the tournament (for example how many games it took until someone dropped to the losers-bracket).

But that's what I'm planning to do!

Edited 7/7/2016 12:53:28

Nice update!

Great update

This button instead of always automatically update and display the information is to prevent our browsing on WL to be slowed right ? If so this is brilliant and if you found a mechanism for this then such a mechanism could be implemtented by Fizzer regarding "common games" with a button to show for this requested player which games were played as teammates or opponents, am I wrong ? I say Fizzer because you said you couldn't access this information yourself.

Games left : "none" could be replaced by "eliminated" maybe ?

Couldnt you also improve past tournaments ?
- Id like the link displayed at the top, the same way past games is (and create a tourney too to stay consistent).
- I would like tournaments I've declined seperated from past tournaments in a new link, with past tournaments only the ones i've played.
- And your button could be useful there to show some stats and the final position (in RR) or stage (semi's, final's...) in brackets tourneys.

Ps : I just realised we can filter to tournaments I have not declined. Not sure of the point to show tourneys players have declined but anyway, my 2nd suggestion is less important (actually useless for me).

Ah another one :
- Add a filter "show tourneys that I have not declined and that have finished".

Edited 7/8/2016 10:00:16

very cool. But is it right that at an single elimination tourney you have 50% done when the first round is over? Equal, if you have 2 or 10 rounds.

If so its not very lucky in my mind :/

@lets fight, yes after the first round 50% of the players are out of the tournament.

@Mike Thanks for your feedback & your suggestions

Yes, the buttons is there to reduce the the number of network requests, since it's not necessary to update the data every time time you visit the tournament overview.

Always replacing "none" with "eliminated" would not be correct, for example in Robin Round tournaments.

I currently don't see a way for me to add filter for tournaments, since they are (in comparison to games) loaded site-wise and not all at once.

@(ง︡'-'︠)ง let's fight!!

Yes, as buddyboyb1 mentioned that's the way it should work now. The system currently just calculates the progress by checking how many games are still missing.

Just a suggestion:

In my mind it should be like this. if the 1 round of 4 is done, then you have 25% done.
because the first 50% are so fast over which gives a wrong picture of the progress. The more progress a Tourney has the more the progressrate slows down and drags out. Which gives a feeling of the tourney never ends. Somehow an unlucky formula ...

Isnt it actually your goal to give a statement to how long a tournament will last?
(because your current first "50%" run at the same time --> So is the tourney over after the 2nd Round? .... No, it isn't.)

What about the following? Which is more ... maybe we can call it, a "time-progress".

(A/8)*0,25+(B/4)*0,25+(C/2)*0,25+(D/1)*0,25

A=amount of games in 1st Round done
B=amount of games in 2nd Round done
C= etc. pp

This is Only an example for 4round Single elimination, but ...

if you change 8,4,2,1 to 2^(n-1),2^(n-2), ...
you can implement the number of rounds each SingleEliminationTourney has (n), what should be given anyway.

also instead of 0,25 here, 1/n

---

for Round Robin the current formula is great, because every round has the same amount of games

---

For double elimination... is a bit trickier, but if you like the idea of "time-progress" and plan to implement it, i can help to find a solution.

Edited 7/10/2016 12:36:02

great update Muli!

@ps Thanks :)

@(ง︡'-'︠)ง let's fight!!
Yeah sooner or later I'd like to switch to a sort of "time-progress". So far I just added the "games-progress" since it was the easiest to implement.

Edited 7/10/2016 12:57:06

Hello !

The userscript just got updated to version 1.13.5.

Instead of the CLOTs table you will now find a table displaying currently active leagues.



The leagues are being managed by ps (https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=486201411).
Contact him if you think the table is out of date. (Thanks @ps for managing it!)

Edited 7/12/2016 22:08:32

hooray

Nice update! I think the Small Earth P/R League should also be included, with about 80 active players.

huddyj: added, thanks.

Only a slight error but you have called one league 'World series of warlight 4' when its actually in its 3rd season.

There's definetely a lot more than 30 players in RPCL2. CORP's roster alone has 10.

I'd say give or take 75.

Edited 7/12/2016 23:22:06

86. Counted. :P

Thanks Onoma <3 I was more or less right. Seems it'll be around 100 next season since we have at least one interested clan for joining though ^_^

Despite the glitches others have noticed Im thrilled about the active leagues section. The tournament options look good too. Data looks correct for me. How much is fizzer paying you for his work?

Hey Muli
When the script active it shows me error on the Dashboard, Tournaments and Past games tabs

Error for Multiplayer address (for tournaments just address changes)
window.onerror in https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer/:5667:34, Uncaught ReferenceError: db is not defined
-
stack=ReferenceError: db is not defined
at Object.readIndex (eval at v (eval at exec (unknown source)), <anonymous>:5667:34)
at ifSettingIsEnabled (eval at v (eval at exec (unknown source)), <anonymous>:2301:14)
at validateUser (eval at v (eval at exec (unknown source)), <anonymous>:4323:9)