""If everybody is simply a rational sociopath there would have been almost no murders since life sentence isn't worth commiting any crime for.""

Commiting murder is probably part of being a rational sociopath. a.k.a Darwinism

Edited 1/17/2017 04:20:09

""homosexuality does have some genetic basis""

I'm not sure I totally believe this. It doesn't help the species in any way. Also, there are far more straight dudes breeding that shouldn't be than their are "homosexuals" doing the same.



Sorry, I had to go do something....

""You mean...like exterminationism that I talked about? You need some group loyalty to do that for a group since it isn't feasible for an individual to exterminate everyone other than himself/herself to somehow achieve benefits due to two reasons:

1.Individuals are probably too weak to carry out such an extermination even in the future.
2.The living standard of such a murderer will likely decrease due to the murder hence he/she won't do it if he/she is rational.""

I'm not talking about killing groups of people I'm talking about killing for personal gain. I see what you're saying about it not working because of social acceptability, though.




""Exterminationism using modern biotechnology is mostly a concern about extremely racist groups that hold power, not crazy individuals. I'm mostly concerned with Germanic nations, Slavic nations, East Asian nations and Islamists commiting mass high-tech exterminations because they have or will have both the ability and sufficient people with the intent to commit them.""

I can get behind that.

""Is there any secular reason why we are better than homosexuals?""

No, it's probably worse unless you just have no sexual drive? My guess is true "asexuality" doesn't even exist.



""Crazy irrational sociopaths can not be controlled either by morality or by law and instead probably just needs to be detained before they commit any crimes.""

They need to find God is what they need to do.

""Then maybe the only type I can think of is murder people to defraud the insurance company. Won't work with a life sentence or even just confiscation of the money + a heavy fine + 30 years. No death penalty necessary here. It's good if people only want to murder for money. Make it unprofitable to murder then they won't.""

Jesus Christ, lol. That problem with all that is that their is not enough to go around.

""Hired murderers will quit their jobs if the possibility of getting caught is sufficiently high and the penalty is sufficiently severe (like fine + incarceration) that it is not profitable.""

It seems like you're advocating murder actually working in society now. I think this discussion got jumbled up.

""If the only thing humans want is material gain we can largely eliminate murder, rape, robbery, etc.""

Again, not enough to go around.

""I have very low sex drive.""

You probably just think to much. :)

""Unless masturbation is banned I will never even try to find a spouse.""

Is this why you're not religous?

Don't answer either of those. :P

""I won't have commited murder if I were a sociopath and the penalty of a murder is a fine of 100,000 dollars only.""

I don't think you would either.... Unless the rules and social structure were veeeeerrrrryyyyy different.

""I was not just religious but a member of several extreme fundamentalist sects. Finally I was basically forced by my secular family to stop religious practices when it caused significant financial damage.""

That's sounds pretty funny. You'll have to tell me that story some time.

Edited 1/17/2017 05:04:36

add me in the pm

What is this chancer?

TABBY, you have not updated your blog ! Get writing ! No more procrastination !

Filteries:
Imperial Militaristic Absolute Monarchy
Religious Conservative Nativism
Capitalist Authoritarianism


Options I din't like: Immigration - I would take in high-skill, same culture whites - i.e., Anglos to America, if we were French I would take Swiss and Belgians. Other than that, bugger off.
Agriculture/resources one doesn't have good options either - the gov't wouldn't own anything but the royal family would to fund their own expenses and the like.
Women not allowed employment but if they have money they can be patrons or landlords so I only said no voting.


Kill gays and trannies. No govt funding for healthcare or education. No central bank. State religion. No income tax.

Good God, is tabby a grown ass man and not just an edgy autistic teenager?

I think the same of you

Politically I identify as communist or revolutionary socialist. I don't like to be affiliated with social democrats but to me, the phase of socialism is more important than the classless communist end goal of Marxism.

Taking a bit of inspiration from above, I'm against some royal family sitting and siphoning wealth they never worked for and power they got not for their qualifications, but for who they just happened to be born by.

I'm for women being allowed to work, which has greatly benefitted both economies and gender equality... I don't know wtf is going on on these forums sometimes tbh, or why some right-wingers remind me so much of the sharia law countries.

I'm also for not killing gays and trans people. In fact I'm gay and if anyone has a problem with that, I suggest they solve their own problem.

For state-funded public healthcare and education. For state-owned bank. Against state religion. Against income tax as this simply becomes unnecessary when the means of production are collectively owned (but for it in capitalist countries). However, like in capitalism, a part of the value created by the workers won't be returned to them, but invested in new production and funding the state expenses, such as the healthcare, education and so on. Instead of accumulating into ever-growing mountains in the pockets of a small elite of billionaries, who never performed an amount of work that could make them deserve as much as hundreds of millions of hard-working but poor people.

Bla... You just admitted you were gay in front of some angry soccons... not the best idea... If the forum was filled with decent people, that would be fine, but it's not.

If people don't like that I say that, people shouldn't start discussing homosexuality or say they think gays should be killed.
Why care what some rightwingers on some internet forum think of me anyway? If they get more angry because I admitted that, it's just amusing.

I suppose. But maybe the far right are like retarded kids. They are too stupid to know better.

I wish there was a way to ban Communists from my threads

I wish there was a way to ban Communists from my threads

Make a thread asking for people's political affiliations but want to ban people from telling it if they don't share yours.
That's rather funny.