@W@n

Revised 15 October

MB is a community of obvious talent. But it's not for everyone. https://www.warzone.com/Forum/623626-busting-myth-myth-busters?Offset=20 If you read the comments in the link I provided, some agree with me, some do not.

Glad you enjoy your thing there, and best of luck in continued success!

Edited 10/16/2022 05:46:48

@Doctor K
Granted, many of people asking for changes are the people who most often win CW - but think about what that really means, we also play CW the most. Look not at the "Wins" column but the "Games" (games played) column, the top clans play the most, so we are CW's biggest supporters. And pls don't confuse our efforts for trying to make it better for us, we're actually trying to figure out which changes would best benefit the community. To get key WZ clans and players who aren't interested in CW to take interest and actually play it, while also make it less of a pressure event, to change the aspects that make real life dedication to the CW schedule a necessity so more casual engagement can still be competitive, while also raising the quality of the games. And we're trying to find changes to recommend with consensus, not just unilaterally make requests/demands that benefit us.

Think of it like a friend makes you a meal that takes good ... but it could be better, and you're somewhat of a chef yourself, so you recommend to add some crushed pepper, let it simmer a bit, etc, to make it tastier.

CW has potential but it has a lot of missed opportunities.

@Krinid

Some of the comments here are toxic, and, they have unfortunately made it look bad for the group.
There are voices of reason, including yours.

Why not put out a poll to the community and ask what changes they would like to see? With Survey Monkey its easy as pie. Then get a hundred people from the top 30 clans to participate, you got something.

As for me? I'd like to see Hanebu 1v1 as a choice in CW.

Edited 9/30/2022 00:50:50

@Doctor K
Fair enough, there are lots of voices, some positive, some not so much. And that's part of the problem, too many opinions that don't converge on common benefit. We are actually taking the discussion to Discord to try to pick a small handful of community positive, easy to implement, highest QoL/enjoyment benefit changes. You're welcome to join the discussion if you want ... the key behind the initiative is consensus. We need to agree on what we're asking to have done.

Thanks for the invite --

Revised 15 October

I don't feel a 'raised fist' logo is welcoming to people like me.

Edited 10/16/2022 05:47:16

Excuse me, I don't understand?

here:

i hope people don't get the wrong message. this closed fist logo was just subliminal advertising for hitting the gym more.


remember the 3 g's: God, a guy/girlfriend, or the gym. Find at least one of them, or else your life will go off the rails and you will start overthinking things as silly as Discord server icons.

Edited 9/30/2022 03:14:23

@l4v.r0v

Edited for content 15 Oct

Fizzer makes the rules here, and he deserves respect. Those that are questioning his ethics about the lawsuit, he may view as disrespectful. Unless there is some fraud there, I wish you would drop the subject. I am only concerned about fraud, not politics.

Thank you -- Dr. K

Edited 10/16/2022 03:47:27

Ok. Thanks for letting us know.

Edited 9/30/2022 05:48:54

You're reading too much into the icon, but suit yourself.

The idea is to get noticed and make a small # of clear, easy and community-wide good recommendations. As simple as that.

Of course Fizzer will appreciate the suggestions of a group that can't agree on the appropriateness of a completely irrelevant icon

As far as I can see there is just one toxic person in the tread and it seeems to be repeat of what I have seen before.
The negative way of life is a mystery to me.

But I guess we all come with history so I can only hope you see life as something to enjoy now! :)

We actually have a couple of seats for this season. Anyone I know who are interested ? : )
Would be helpful if you mail me right away.

bump

still always recruiting, although next season we plan to only run with 38. long live myth busters

pretty sure you could run with less then 30 now.

Statement above is pretty much proven true by now

bump

oh alex did it for me <3

I haven't played much over the past year, and I haven't participated in that many CW games, but here's a hot take. All the talk about striking, making Fizzer's life miserable by spamming, etc: won't work. It actually shows quite a bit of disrespect. This game has always been free to play, you're not forced to play in CW, nor are you forced to pay anything if you don't wish to. There are no lootboxes or p2w content. In the end, it is Fizzer's game and he chooses what's on the roadmap and what's not.

Does that mean he should ignore the community when it is angry or is providing feedback? Of course not. It's just that Fizzer has (and this is speculation on my part) stopped being transparent in what his roadmap is. Most major updates have been hit with controversy, shouting people, angry mails and disappointed forum posts. Keep in mind that the community posting on these threads is always the minority, whether you like it or not. Fizzer talking to players who enjoy CW in its current state is confirmation that it is indeed a good, maybe slightly flawed system. Can it be better? Yes. Is there a large incentive for Fizzer to dedicate his time towards it? Maybe, maybe not.

I think Knyte's solution is the best. Find a bunch of players who represent a big chunk of the community and have them provide feedback in a useful way. "We think X is bad because of Y and would like to see Z amendment to this feature." We've seen suggestions like that on this thread already. It's just that they're buried below the clutter.

You're not getting anywhere with antagonizing Fizzer, and you shouldn't. If you want something to change, work constructively.

+1 Farah

And please stop throwing tomato soup on Artwork!

Edited 11/15/2022 23:40:07