Meh. My solution was better. You will realise it was, one day. Just saying.

Edited 3/10/2014 20:03:52

The similarities between bia and lynx: both earned their way to group a. GG did not earn their way to Group A, they were just viewed as a very skilled clan and worthy of Group A. That is why they started at the bottom. The difference is earning it.

Lynx and 101st will texhincially be in the same clan for the clan league, but we will do other clan events seperately. We fought for 101st to get a spot in the lowest group, apparently we have lost. Time to accept defeat. One clan will compete from the Lynx/101st pact and that clan will be in Group A (competing under the 101st name).

Widzizs, your idea is fine, and I am sure the current lynx will discuss it, but I think most of us really like the name lynx :)

Turtles will be competing again.us Last season we were unorganized and had some player issues. In the abcense of our leader i am in charge of recruiting, tournaments, and clan battles.

Personally I think that their should be 6 teams per division and as many divisions as competing clans. In case of an odd number (not divisible by 6) the lowest clan would get less compatition. Lowest 2 clans in A would get replaced by top 2 clans in B. Do the same fod all other divisions. The top 2 Clans in A will get a large say on what the next seasons templates will be. I would suggest 6 1vs1 Strategic ME and 3 2vs2 Strategic 2vs2 and 3 Imp. Rom. 2vs2 and 2 3vs3 Santcuary..... Just my thoughts.....





Gladiators or Turtles should be promoted to C.

I would like to see the clans per division evened out, but it cannot happen until next season. The numbers would have to be set now, along with the promotion/demotion slots to accomplish that between season 5 and 6.

....Master L..... -__-"

Lynx will be treated as a new clan and as such will have to start from group C/D that said if they want to go back under the 101st Tag then they can play in group A.

Next clan league, the groups will be split into groups of 6 so plan accordingly and stay in the top 4 of your group.

How soon will this be starting and who do I send my roster to?

Also for the 1vs1 games I don't like how my "worst" player may end up against the "best" player from another clan. Each clan lets say Clans A B C D well on there roster they should have their #1 player marked and #2 #3 #4 then some clans don't get the advantage of their best player playing all the other clans worst player thats admited........ Sorry if this is confusing

Miyagi, please explain your decision so we (Lynx and the rest of the clans) can understand the reasoning behind the choice you made.

Could we incorporate Multi Attack? That hasn't been used in a while.....

101st will be represented by the lynx and 101st members this season again in Group A. I asked Chris yesterday and he verified this is fine.

We will submit our lineup at a later time.

Edited 3/12/2014 01:27:22

Yes lets do multi-attack...maybe with the duel map?

Hrmmm I like multi-attack but do enough people know how to play it sufficiently?
It might adversely effect some of the smaller clans. Not that I am opposed to the idea. It could be fun, but it is something to consider. As it is not a very common game type.

No no no to multi attack, we won't have it.

I'd rather not have MA either :/

Why not @Apollo and @General Arun Its something different and throws EVERYONE off slightly....

That reduces the competitiveness though; I think it's a lot more interesting if the templates are things everyone is proficient in - means the league is more of a top level event.

Yeah, Multiattack completely changes the game, WAY too much. Local Deployment changes it a lot too, but MA takes it to a whole new level. It is a nich setting on warlight, and it should not be used in the clan league.