> I have this feeling that Masters have told Nauz to stop responding bc he's making them look bad. It's the most logical move for Masters
Not at all. I stopped responding because the dude's a moron, and my last post literally said I was done responding to him.
> That's cool dude. I'm glad you look down on the Small Earth community. It's literally, by far, the most popular map, and most of the people who play Small Earth quickmatches have no notion at all about your weird social hierarchies or dick measuring contests amongst you "old elite" players.
It's a popular map because it's the first map unlocked on QM. That's literally the entire reason. Check open games. Rise of Rome is easily the most popular map in terms of games people actually create manually.
Small Earth is nothing but a luck-heavy early map that newbies learn to play as baby's first map. It's too small to allow much counter-play, having an early lead in it is nearly a guaranteed win unless you screw up hard, which makes it decided by picks, and with there being so few picks available, players often make identical picks, which results in first pick luck deciding who wins.
> But, make no mistake, you are no master at it. I know dozens of people who'd destroy you at it, and none of them are masters. So don't underestimate them
No worries bro. Underestimating people seems to be your schtick, not mine. You've never played me a single game, yet seem to think you know dozens of people who are better than me. Yet, somehow you haven't backed any of this up, with a single shred of evidence. You're not criticizing my play, or my picks, or even looking at games I've played, nah, you're just talking out your ass. Keep it up, it's a good look.
> A Small Earth battle best of 11 will be won by Sanmu because Johnny doesn't play that template much I think and because Sanmu will play good against Johnny I think on the Small Earth template. In this discussion Sanmu is really strong.
I don't need to play the template much, it's the first map on QM for a reason, it's got the lowest skill ceiling of almost any map in the game. You have 37% 1v1, leave the judgment of players to those with a basic grasp of how to play.
> But I hope he does. That way we can stop the shit-talk and just make it objective. And Phobos can moderate too :) It'll be great.
How would a small earth challenge be objective? I doubt you'd win even at that, but we can pretend you would if you like. You beat me at your best template and one I never play? What exactly does that prove? That you're better than me at small earth? Is that an achievement? You claimed I was supposedly bad at the templates I do play a lot. Beating me at those might prove that, I'm not sure what beating me at small earth would even be an attempt at proving. That you can win more coinflips?
I'll play you, best of 11 at small earth and a best of 11 at strat ME. The strat ME is so you can actually prove something objective. Small earth's just because I'm feeling malicious and might as well add insult to injury by beating you at your own game while I'm at it, there's just something sublime about kicking a man while he's down that I can't seem to resist.
But there's a requirement. You need to really put your money where your mouth's at, to make it worth my time, every game has to also have a 1000 coin bet attached to it. If you're actually as confident as you claim to be this shouldn't be an issue.
It's funny that people think the rest of Masters is asking me to back down though, since the only actual comment about this thread on our discord was this:
Edited 5/17/2021 12:18:45