It would be helpful if you gave your reasons for voting for X player or changing from X to Y. We need to gather as much information as possible at this stage.
Arun, as far as I'm aware your reason for wanting a multi-lynch is to wipe out all the players who look like their inactive in one day so later days aren't wasted lynching inactive instead of wolves. Villages who don't contribute aren't going to be much of a help later in the game anyway.
Ace and Balls, you seem to be thinking like I did initially. Why risk killing loads of villages early when we have wolves to hunt. A multi-lynch is a massive risk because it could potentially kill off many villages who, even if inactive, could be of use later (as a meat shield/extra lives for the village). Also branding villagers who missed the first vote as inactive is a bit reckless after just one vote.
I think it would probably best to lynch a single inactive player atm. But I'm going with the one confirmed villager because I have votes against me (for reasons that still aren't that clear to me, just because I missed the first vote?) and I don't want to risk myself - I don't think I have much choice at the moment. I'm not too happy with the 'dictatorship' that general Arun is leading, but it's probably best for the village until there are other confirmed villagers.
As much as I hate to admit it, Arun is our biggest asset at the moment. But I may change my vote depending on how this plays out because I have to say I leaning towards Ace's and His Balls' argument.
tl;dr I think the answer atm is following Arun, but I don't think Arun should be pushing a multi-lynch this early on. I think we should lynch one inactive/lurker player first, and then after the second vote we'll know with more certainty who is active and who is lurking and who is inactive. Then we could proceed the a multi-lynch if necessary.
Yup, I certainly would. The thinking is it doesn't really matter if inactive players get lynched (Although some aren't so sure, including myself as shown above) because they're not contributing anyway.
But if the wolves stop lurking it makes them easier to identify.
I feel like a multi-lynch has as much a chance of hitting us as the wolves. Worse yet, what if we accidentally hit an angel just because we got hasty early on? It's only day 2 after all, we can start getting frisky on day 3-4.
Aiming at lurkers and inactive players is distracting us from our main purpose (i.e. taking out the wolves)
Can someone tally the votes anew? I'm confused who I have to vote for to aid in the multi-lynch.
I agree with the risk. What you are failing to see is that I am not intending to lynch every one of these suspects. As I said before, I will hammer later. I expect 1-3 kills today; 3 is pretty unlikely though. Please, keep the players balenced (although it is fine to abandon the Green and Landalf votes; avoid them).
I won't cast my vote without discussion. Opinions will be discussed here and I will talk to each potential lynchee in private. However for now we should just get the votes even.
Dr.Stupid - no summary A Talking Taco - the guy who made this list Arun - no summary his Balls - no summary Landalf -wonders if Arun is dead Green - Posted the votes on the post above Genral Gror - wants to know why people voted people Coaleyes - voted Green